
Suzy Menkes is in town for the International Herald Tribune Techno Luxury Conference - I had the honor to meet her for an interview and asked her about the "editorialista" phenomenon, fashion editors all dressed up looking model-like:
Suzy Menkes: I don't think the business of showing yourself at a fashion show just started with the internet, not at all. When I first went to the Paris shows, which was at the end of the 70s, the british students used to manage getting themselves cross the barriers. They didn't have any invitations for any shows, but they would parade around where the shows were held, wearing the most fantastic outfits. And it wasn't quite the same as now, because, you know, a lot of showing yourself right now is more showing that you got a certain style that's been developed by somebody, whether it's the Balenciaga or Balmain look or whatever. But this was purely individual style, more of what you get in Berlin, than what you get in London today. So I mean, I would argue that dressing up for fashion shows is going on for a long time.
Though today it gained a bigger presence through streetstyle blogs.
Yes, absolutely. I think everything that has to do with fashion being original is what the industry needs. Otherwise it gets very tired. It's good to have new things. It's like what the Sartorialist did - the journalist in me always longs to arrange the Sartorialist's pictures in order to make some fashion statements or explanations, though I know this is not the purpose of the site. But as a journalist you can't stop being a journalist. Same way as I not look at fashion shows, asking whether that would look good at me. I take myself out of the occasion.
The so promoted styles seem so according to a certain ideal of being tall, skinny and beautiful, and the style is standardized by wearing all labels..
I don't think it's about that. I very much appreciate people who got a passion for fashion, because I have a passion for fashion. I think it's great if people just do their own thing and get it together. And this is what I actually think about the whole business of blogging, you know some blogs are rubbish, but some are really good and really interesting. And the fact that various people bubbled up to the surface because of the internet has brought a great value to fashion.
And what do you think about 13 year old blogger-star Tavi?
Well, you know, what I really think about her is that I hope, when she gets dumped so cruely, as she will be, no doubt, by all the fashion people who've written her up, she can sort of cope with that. I met her in New York, and she seems quite level-headed, quite sensitive to not get carried away. I think it's very tough for her, she's been made by the Rodarte sisters... But I like what she says, I think it's interesting.
So do you think blogging as it is now performed is a hype, or does it have the potential to establish a critical method to write about fashion?
I think all people are looking for somebody with a critical judgement they can trust and they are interested in. But critical don't has to mean, that you don't like it. Sometimes there is a lot of rudeness and ignorance on the blogs. I find it quite depressing, especially when they are attacking a designer, who has given a tremendous value to the world and is maybe slightly fading. But you still have to take in the equation, what she or he has done in the past. Other people are too gushy, everything is fantastic and wonderfull. And my question is: why? If it is so wonderful, why is it so wonderful?
I'd like to think that there will always be sources of intelligent criticism, to put it the best way. There is a certain freshness about the best of the bloggers, that I find very fun and satisfying and often interesting. Certainly when you come to Twitter, the questions that where send to me via Twitter to ask Nathalie Massanet and the others are very good and I sit there thinking, well, why didn't I think of that question? It's really smart. Twitter is a great example for a sort of give and take. Of course there are annoying things. I am so not interested to know when somebody sits in the front row and their shoes hurt, but someone in the frontrow might also make a really good tweet, where the 140 characters can say something really funny and punchy. It just depends on the person.